<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Quick Look at Balancing Flash at Sunset, Quickly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset</link>
	<description>Ideas, Inspiration, Information and Discussions for Emerging Commercial Photographers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wizwow</title>
		<link>http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/comment-page-1/#comment-21684</link>
		<dc:creator>wizwow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 15:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/#comment-21684</guid>
		<description>Absolutely. The size of the light source is the determiner of soft light.

What I am referring to in this shot is that the light be &#039;soft&#039; as it falls across the stage. With all that foreground, a &#039;beam&#039; of light would have seemed harsh, while the spread of light, and at such a small amount, the beach looks more natural, and the soft ambient but a bit raised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. The size of the light source is the determiner of soft light.</p>
<p>What I am referring to in this shot is that the light be &#8216;soft&#8217; as it falls across the stage. With all that foreground, a &#8216;beam&#8217; of light would have seemed harsh, while the spread of light, and at such a small amount, the beach looks more natural, and the soft ambient but a bit raised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jouni</title>
		<link>http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/comment-page-1/#comment-21683</link>
		<dc:creator>Jouni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 15:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/#comment-21683</guid>
		<description>Thanks for a nice tutorial. This is just the kind of step-by-step explanation that I think is perfect for learning.

One comment though:
&quot;I also had Jimi check to make sure the flash was zoomed out to wide angle so it would be a softer, wider light on Briana&quot;
Do you agree, that the softness of light comes from the size and distance of the light, not the spread of the beam?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a nice tutorial. This is just the kind of step-by-step explanation that I think is perfect for learning.</p>
<p>One comment though:<br />
&#8220;I also had Jimi check to make sure the flash was zoomed out to wide angle so it would be a softer, wider light on Briana&#8221;<br />
Do you agree, that the softness of light comes from the size and distance of the light, not the spread of the beam?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wedding_photographer</title>
		<link>http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>wedding_photographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 22:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Fantastic post - I can really live the episode with you. 

I like your way of working - I do not use a lightmeter either and would take a similar approach to yours... even though it would probably take me much longer :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic post &#8211; I can really live the episode with you. </p>
<p>I like your way of working &#8211; I do not use a lightmeter either and would take a similar approach to yours&#8230; even though it would probably take me much longer <img src='http://www.lighting-essentials.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wizwow</title>
		<link>http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>wizwow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Hi,
ISO is 100 for me usually, 200 sometimes. I can go to 800 once in a while, but only for effect or if the light just needs the extra boost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
ISO is 100 for me usually, 200 sometimes. I can go to 800 once in a while, but only for effect or if the light just needs the extra boost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gt007</title>
		<link>http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>gt007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Great work..had a question, what was the ISO you used for your work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work..had a question, what was the ISO you used for your work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wizwow</title>
		<link>http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>wizwow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Hi fexy01

No, what I meant was in order to get an idea of what the setting would be I set the camera to Aperture Value, and shot a few. That gave me an initial starting point to begin the lighting. I am going to clarify above, as it is a bit confusing. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi fexy01</p>
<p>No, what I meant was in order to get an idea of what the setting would be I set the camera to Aperture Value, and shot a few. That gave me an initial starting point to begin the lighting. I am going to clarify above, as it is a bit confusing. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fexy01</title>
		<link>http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>fexy01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lighting-essentials.com/january-28-a-quick-look-at-balancing-flash-at-sunset/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Again, great stuff.  One question... By &quot;AV&quot;, do you mean ambient value?  I thought it was something like that from the context, but wasn&#039;t sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, great stuff.  One question&#8230; By &#8220;AV&#8221;, do you mean ambient value?  I thought it was something like that from the context, but wasn&#8217;t sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

